Leonard Lawrence Pilot and the Official Solicitor

6 October 2011 Boeing Aircraft Company settle claim for neurotoxins in aircraft cabin air, in a case filed in the United States of America.

4 July 2005 Leonard Lawrence 1990 NHS & COMMUNITY CARE ASSESSMENT REPORT identified Toxic Cabin Air and Organophosphate poisoning. No evidence exists that this report was ever disclosed to Slough and Reading County Court by the Official Solicitor to the Senior Courts.

Ex-pilot sues for lack of care - See Article

GOOGLE:  Leonard Lawrence Pilot 30 August 2012 His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, Reading County Court, is  entirely satisfied by the non disclosure of the 1990 NHS & COMMUNITY CARE ASSESSMENT REPORT by the Official Solicitor to the Senior Courts and Ratcliffe Duce & Gammer Solicitors Reading. His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, is also entirely satisfied that Leonard Lawrence  interests were fully and fairly protected by the Official Solicitor and Ratcliffe Duce & Gammer Solicitors Reading by the non disclosure of the 1990 NHS & COMMUNITY CARE ASSESSMENT REPORT. Others do not support His Honour Judge Oliver,  Reading County Court , view Law Society investigating Solicitor report dated 30 September 2009. Disclosed 2011 The Official Solicitor was acting as Mr Lawrence's representative and Guardian and as such had the greater duty to protect him. I consider that the majority of the steps that Mr Lawrence feel should have been taken to protect him should have been taken by the Official Solicitor rather than the firm including the decision and action necessary to invoke the Court of Protection. 24 August 2011 Law Society, Legal Services, disclose correspondence sent by the Solicitors Regulatory Authority to the Court of Protection on 20 July 2010 Mr. Lawrence had come within the jurisdiction of the Court of Protection The Law Society, Solicitors Regulatory Authority, FINAL REPORT CRO/97504-2008. "Issues raised by Mr Lawrence are significant and should be investigated and responded to on the basis that they indicate areas in which the legal system appears to have failed to sufficiently protect an extremely vulnerable adult". Dr Vanessa Davies, Director, Bar Standards Board We do not have any powers to make Mr Brazil, Mr Allen answer your queries. The current Official Solicitor (Mr Pitblado) wrote to the BSB on 24 June 2009. In his letter he explained that the point had not been reached at which the Court of Protection should have been notified of the existence of the CP3. As the BSB was entitled to do, we took views of the Official Solicitor Mr Pitblado. The fact that you were a patient was plain from supporting documents. 24 August 2011 Solicitors Regulatory Authority to the Court of Protection; Mr. Lawrence had come within the jurisdiction of the Court of Protection Hospital Medical Director Report reference: Leonard Lawrence He was then medicated to the extent that he lost mental capacity. During the period the Official Solicitor of the Supreme Court acted as his Guardian ad Litem, three Court of Protection medical certificates (CP3s) had been obtained but not registered with the Court of Protection.  He was, therefore, for nearly 18 months regarded as a mentally ill patient without access to the Court of Protection. During this time considerable amounts of his assets went missing. Emeritus Professor of Medicinal Chemistry Malcolm Hooper Journal of Biological Physics and Chemistry 11 (209-215) In the Lawrence case there appears to be sound grounds for legal action and significant compensation claims for mistreatment and false diagnoses and an appalling failure of the duty of care. Graham C. Holt Collegium Basilea (Institute of Advance Study), Basel, Switzerland Journal of Biological Physics and Chemistry 11 (216-220) At this point the tenor of the presentation changed dramatically from calm, logic science to the harrowing story of one pilot, Len Lawrence.... His story was one of costly legal battles to prove that his brain injury was due to chemical exposure and that he was not mentally unfit. What emerged was a story of incompetence by the medical profession, who lacked knowledge of the symptoms following exposure to neurotoxins and the unfairness of the legal profession in not allowing him to see data concerning his own personal records in their reluctance to tackle those culpable. Sarah Mackenzie Ross,  Director of the Neuropsychology Toxicology Unit London and Honorary Senior Lecturer, Doctorate in Clinical Psychology, University College London. Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 Subject: Re: FW: Neurotoxins Dear Len, Thank you for the update - I hope you are OK? - it must be rather shocking and frightening to learn your cognitive function is getting worse. I hope the hospital consultants can help you. I would be happy to talk to them if you think that would be helpful. I would be very interested to know how you get on in the future so please keep in touch if you can? Best wishes, Sarah Consultant Haematologist Dear Mr Lawrence I am sorry that we will not be able to accept you as a donor. This is because of your history of organophosphate poisoning that has left you with ongoing nervous system problems. Consultant Haematologist Doctor. (Commander Royal Navy) Dear Len, Thank you for keeping me updated and of new matters arising concerning OPs. I have as promised been circulating to various media agencies what you permitted me to do. My wish is that sooner rather than later someone is GOING TO TAKE THIS SERIOUSLY or are we again going to suffer another PTSD sage. A diagnosis put up in the DSM II in 1968 then ignored entirely until the Americans decided to name another illness with all the criteria of Reactive depression into PTSD in 1980 called the DSM IV. One wonders if a deliberate and orchestrated campaign is again being waged against such people. Since the Hillsborough Disaster when to Police officers witnessing that incident unfolding knew things were wrong. A cover up by Police, Lawyers and all and sundry. An absolute disgrace by all named that has caused so much heart ache, distress to so many bereaved families. This has now been confirmed by families NOT GIVING IN to deceptions. My one wish again is that by individuals like yourself and Lee and others, NEVER GIVE IN, but stand resolute and strong in bringing down these corrupt and deceitful persons who were responsible for all your hurt and pain too. Rest assured I am alongside you in exposing this unlawful and criminal activity. I do thank you Len, as you are on the button with all this as I am trying to catch up as they say! Take care my friend, and look forward to meeting and having another chat soon. Professor of Psychiatry Dear Leonard, Good to hear from you.  I hope you're feeling well. Thanks also for the report. Things seem to be moving now.  Best wishes, Go Bravely Court of Protection Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 11:59:42 +0100 Subject: RE: Leonard Lawrence Dear Mr Lawrence, HHJ Simon Oliver does not hold a Court of Protection nomination. Kind regards James Batey Court of Protection, Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 4LL DX 44450 Strand Tel: 0300-456-4600 Email: courtofprotectionenquiries@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Principal Registry of the Family Division From: eliot.webster@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk To: bae146@hotmail.co.uk Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:00:33 +0100 Subject: RE: Appeal High Court Family Judge Dear Mr Lawrence The appeal application needs to be lodged with the Court of Protection. They are based in the Thomas More Building at the Royal Court of Justice (switchboard number is 020 7947 6000). You will also require leave to appeal, unless HHJ Simon Oliver granted this and this need to be included in the appeal. The Court of Protection Act 2007, Rules 172 & 175 will assist you. The file, in the first instance, should be sent to the Court of Protection. I hope this information assists. Kind Regards, Eliot Webster Principal Registry of the Family Division From: eliot.webster@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk To: bae146@hotmail.co.uk Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 16:13:01 +0100 Subject: RE: Appeal High Court Family Judge Dear Mr Lawrence, I referred the matter to the Senior District Judge, District Judge Waller, who informed me of the details I provided you in the e-mail which I sent you yesterday at 14:01. I suggest that the appeal is issued before the file is transferred to the Court of Protection. I hope the above information assists. Kind Regards, Eliot Webster Principal Registry of the Family Division Has His Honour Judge Simon Oliver placed a Gagging order  on a disabled person? Suspected abuse of a vulnerable adult His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, Reading County Court, 30 August 2012 I am entirely satisfied that he was properly, conscientiously and well represented by RDG in the AR proceedings and that his interests were fully and fairly protected by the Official Solicitor and RDG. Court of Protection role a rubber stamping role Hospital Medical Director Report reference: Leonard Lawrence was then medicated to the extent that he lost mental capacity. During the period the Official Solicitor of the Supreme Court acted as his Guardian ad Litem, three Court of Protection medical certificates (CP3s) had been obtained but not registered with the Court of Protection. He was, therefore, for nearly 18 months regarded as a mentally ill patient without access to the Court of Protection. During this time considerable amounts of his assets went missing. Royal Courts of Justice. There is leave to issue this claim against the Official Solicitor. High Court Master “ disgraceful” Court of Protection Mr. Lawrence, HHJ Simon Oliver does not hold a Court of Protection nomination. Kind regards High Court Judge, Family Division September 2010 Mr Anelay QC Deputy High Court Judge, Family Division, Head of Chambers 1 Kings Bench Walk informs Leonard Lawrence that Mr Dominic Brazil of Counsel had informed Mr Anelay QC that Leonard Lawrence had been a patient and subject to the Court of Protection Manager, Compliance and Regulatory Unit, Office of the Public Guardian Ref CSCU516/08 The Court of Protection has no record of any application being received for you. It was clearly the responsibility of the holder of the medical certificate to ensure an application was made. (Given to DJ McCulloch 28 August 2008) Martin John. Chief Executive and the Public Guardian letter. It would have been the responsibility of the certificate holder to make an application to the Court Solicitors Regulatory Authority Dear Mr. Lawrence, With regard to filing medical certificates with the Court of Protection, this would have been the responsibility of your own advisers. Suspected abuse of a vulnerable adult The Law Society Solicitor Disclosed 2011. As acknowledged by the firm, (Ratcliffe Duce & Gammer Solicitors Reading) it had Mr Lawrence sign forms when he clearly lacked capacity. The Law Society Solicitor The Official Solicitor was acting as Mr Lawrence’s representative and Guardian and as such had the greater duty to protect him. I consider majority of the steps Mr Lawrence feels should have been taken to protect him should have been taken by the Official Solicitor rather than the firm including the decision and action necessary to invoke the protection of the Court of Protection The Law Society, Solicitors Regulatory Authority, FINAL REPORT CRO/97504. “Issues raised by Mr Lawrence are significant and should be investigated and responded to on the basis that they indicate areas in which the legal system appears to have failed to sufficiently protect an extremely vulnerable adult”. Email NAllen@29bedfordrow.co.uk 05 August 2005 10.30 From Nicholas Allen To Dominic Brazil 1 Kings Bench Walk Subject: Lawrence As requested. I have simply “accepted all” the tracked changes. I haven’t fully checked what effect this has had on the draft order, but hope that it is sufficient for your purposes Best Wishes! Nick 25 August 2010 Nicholas Allen 29 Bedford Row Chambers am unable to provide “evidence that supports my oral statement to DJ Fortgang that the Official Solicitor (Laurence Oades) (sic) agreed that the house be sold for 622,000.” Divisional Managers, Official Solicitors Office, “The Official Solicitor is not authorized to make financial decisions on Mr. Lawrence’s behalf.” Graham C. Holt Collegium Basilea (Institute of Advance Study), Basel, Switzerland Journal of Biological Physics and Chemistry 11 (216-220) the unfairness of the legal profession in not allowing him to see data concerning his own personal records in their reluctance to tackle those culpable. Emeritus Professor of Medicinal Chemistry Malcolm Hooper Journal of Biological Physics and Chemistry 11 (209-215) In the Lawrence case there appears to be sound grounds for legal action and significant compensation claims for mistreatment and false diagnoses and an appalling failure of the duty of care. Suspected abuse of a vulnerable adult 20 July 2010 Solicitors Regulatory Authority letter to the Court of Protection: Mr. Lawrence had come within the jurisdiction of the Court of Protection 2011 Devon & Cornwall Police Crime and Justice Department Dear Mr Lawrence I can confirm that no Court of Protection Certificates were released to us by the Law Society, therefore no certificates were passed to Thames Valley Police when they took on the investigation. Crime and Justice Department NOTE TO CIRCUIT JUDGE RE APPEAL OF MR. LAWRENCE 4/10/06 District Judge Jones Mr. Lawrence was convinced that Mrs. Lawrence’s Counsel had shown me his without prejudice proposal on a previous occasion. Mrs. Lawrence’s Counsel said he had not. I certainly had no knowledge of this, but for the avoidance of any doubt disqualified myself from hearing the ancillary relief application. My next involvement was when RDG submitted their legal aid bill for assessment.(2006) I cannot find the ORDER I made disqualifying myself. If I said I disqualified myself from everything, that would include the legal aid assessment. On 25 October 2006 HHJ Campbell conducts search of Slough County Court and identifies four hearings that DJ Jones conducted after DJ Jones made a ORDER disqualifying herself and Mr. Lawrence was certified Part V11 Mental Health Act 1983 and a patient subject to the Court of Protection. JF/LAW/130835 Corporate Legal Team. Legal Service Commission cannot lawfully grant funding to an individual if they are not financially eligible. The LSC Manual, Volume 2 Part F Pages 298 to 303. CLSMEANS1 identifies Mr. Lawrence had been £331,622 over the eligibility limit In 2008/9 Susan Andrews, Head of Family Law, BP Collins Solicitors, Gerrards Cross, Buckinghamshire and Dominic Brazil 1 Kings Bench Walk Attempted to gain a Civil Restraint Order against Leonard Lawrence. This was stopped by Her Honour Judge Ann Campbell, His Honour Judge Elly and District Judge Kathryn McCulloch. BP Collins Solicitors and Dominic Brazil of Counsel had also failed to disclose to the court a Certificate of Mental Incapacity they held under Part V11 Mental Health Act 1983 that was issued to safeguard Leonard Lawrence. Slough County Court 28 August 2008 Susan Andrews BP Collins Solicitors “This is an application that is likely to come to £4000” District Judge McCulloch “You have only written two letters” Slough County Court March 2009 District Judge McCulloch “It’s not going to happen” District Judge McCulloch dismissed Susan Andrews and BP Collins Solicitors fee’s of nearly £15,000. Suspected abuse of a vulnerable adult May Maughan, The Deputy Official Solicitor: “We are not prepared to answer any further queries and your correspondence in future, whether by e-mail, hard copy letter, or telephone, will not be answered, nor acknowledged. Yours sincerely May Maughan Deputy Official Solicitor Office of the Official Solicitor and Public Trustee Tel: 020 7911 7121 – may.maughan@offsol.gsi.gov.uk Only when after six years had elapsed and May Maughan, Deputy Official Solicitor was of the belief that Leonard Lawrence was out of time to bring a claim for damages did Simpson Millar LLP solicitors apply for, and May Maughan release, previously undisclosed documents from Leonard Lawrence case files. On the 20 April 2012 Paul Hicks a solicitor with Simpson Millar LLP informed Leonard Lawrence that on disclosure of Leonard Lawrence files from the Official Solicitors office, May Maughan, Deputy Official Solicitor in a telephone conversation had admitted liability for Leonard Lawrence non registration with the Court of Protection by Helen Clift. How Simpson Millar LLP could represent Leonard Lawrence since 2008 without gaining his case files is unknown. The documents St Philips Chambers had sought could not be found on inspection of the Official Solicitors files in March 2012 at Simpson Millar LLP office. Photos taken show pages having been torn out of files. Some of what was found is detailed below Alistair Pitblado, Official Solicitor to the Supreme Court submission to the Bar Standards Board dated 24 June 2009 identified that the court was not told by his solicitors that Court of Protection CP3’s had been processed, that psychiatrists had identified that Mr. Lawrence required the Court of Protection, and that Mr. Lawrence interests must be protected.

• a) Rosemary Sanders (Solicitor at OS) 27 June 2005 email Sarah Benfield RDG Solicitors: Once we have a satisfactory CP3 we can apply to the Court of Protection for authority to sign a release of his rights of occupation... this would have to be supported by a court order dealing with the property. As matters stand the psychiatrist has completed a CP3.
• b) James Beck (Solicitor at OS) 1 August 2005 I spoke to Sarah Benfield RDG Solicitors: Obviously, the sale cannot proceed until we have Court of Protection authority.
• c) Piper, Steve (OSPT) Sent: 02 February 2006 I said that the OS would send the form to the Court of Protection who would make the appropriate order.
• d) Clift, Helen (OSPT) Sent: 02 February 2006 To: Piper, Steve (OSPT) Subject: RE: Mr Lawrence ok essentially it should allow the solicitors to release to him the funds they are holding.

The paper trail of the Official Solicitor sending the form to the Court of Protection to make the appropriate order has not been found. Helen Clift made the financial decisions not Laurence Oades the former Official Solicitor. Records identify Helen Clift failed to disclose to two District Judges and His Honour Judge Elly the need for the Court of Protection. Helen Clift had also given the instructions to gain Leonard Lawrence signature on legal aid forms. Suspected abuse of a vulnerable adult HHJ Simon Oliver writes at point 27 on his Judgement "H says that his counsel, at the hearing on 18th August 2005, says that the Official Solicitor did not agree the sale of the fmh at £622,000. However there is no evidence of this". HHJ Simon Oliver has clearly not read the following information: RDG Solicitors notes 18 August 2005 disclosed 2012:- Simon Calhaem “wife has accepted an offer and has exchanged contracts without recourse to the Official Solicitor” Simon Calhaem “wife is in breach of the order by not agreeing the sale price,” 25 August 2010 Nicholas Allen 29 Bedford Row Chambers I am unable to provide “evidence that supports my oral statement to DJ Fortgang that the Official Solicitor (Laurence Oades) (sic) agreed that the house be sold for 622,000.” Mr. A. Wilson FRCS FFAEM FRCS (Consultant Surgeon) Clinical Director Royal London Hospital Mr. A. Wilson FRCS, Dr McGhee FFARCS, Dr Murray and Mr. Edmond all had been considered unsuitable to act as guardian ad litem by Slough County Court. Lord Justice Ward [2009] EWCA Civil 1122 Marco Pierre White –and- Withers LLP 29th October 2009 - Comment by Lord Justice Ward 63. The Family Division’s practice to admit all relevant evidence in the search for truth or to impose sanctions where there has been improper conduct. 67. Furthermore, it must always be remembered that solicitors are officers of the court and if they are shown to have done wrong they should face the judgment of the court. It is not conducive to the administration of justice that such claims are simply swept under the carpet. It is in the public interest that the bounds of proper conduct be clarified. Letter from the Court of Protection. If Mr Lawrence or the police require any Order an application can be made to the Court of Protection. Paul Wainwright Court of Protection Leonard Lawrence Pilot and the Official Solicitor to the Supreme Court Law Society investigating Solicitor report dated 30 September 2009. Disclosed 2011 The Official Solicitor was acting as Mr Lawrence's representative and Guardian and as such had the greater duty to protect him. I consider that the majority of the steps that Mr Lawrence feel should have been taken to protect him should have been taken by the Official Solicitor rather than the firm including the decision and action necessary to invoke the Court of Protection. 24 August 2011 Law Society, Legal Services, disclose correspondence sent by the Solicitors Regulatory Authority to the Court of Protection on 20 July 2010 Mr. Lawrence had come within the jurisdiction of the Court of Protection The Law Society, Solicitors Regulatory Authority, FINAL REPORT CRO/97504-2008. "Issues raised by Mr Lawrence are significant and should be investigated and responded to on the basis that they indicate areas in which the legal system appears to have failed to sufficiently protect an extremely vulnerable adult". 24 August 2011 Law Society, Legal Services, disclose correspondence sent by the Solicitors Regulatory Authority to the Court of Protection on 20 July 2010 20 July 2010 Solicitors Regulatory Authority letter to the Court of Protection: Mr. Lawrence had come within the jurisdiction of the Court of Protection   Hospital Medical Director Report reference: Leonard Lawrence: He was then medicated to the extent that he lost mental capacity. During the period the Official Solicitor of the Supreme Court  acted as his Guardian ad Litem, three Court of Protection  medical certificates (CP3s) had been obtained but not  registered  with the Court of Protection. He was, therefore, for nearly 18 months regarded as a mentally ill patient without access to the Court of Protection. During this time considerable amounts of his assets went missing. Test by Professor Abou-Donia in January 2006. Professor of  Pharmacology and Cancer Biology and of Neurobiology  (Paid for by British Airline Pilots Association) Tau and MBP suggest the presence of moderate brain injury. Consistent with  chemical –induced nervous system injury. Professor Ramsden, Cranfield University Workshop Leonard Lawrence invited to talk about his medical history and the failure of the legal system to protect him. PRESS RELEASE 1 November 2011. Ref UK Department of Transport “Aircraft Cabin Air Sampling Study” This report actually found significant concentration of organophosphate neurotoxins and other noxious substances in cabin air even under normal flying conditions. Report carelessly and uncritically quoted by UK Transport Minister Theresa Villiers Emeritus Professor of Medicinal Chemistry Malcolm Hooper Journal of Biological Physics and Chemistry 11 (209-215) In the Lawrence case there appears to be sound grounds for legal action and significant compensation claims for mistreatment and false diagnoses and an appalling failure of the duty of care. Graham C. Holt Collegium Basilea (Institute of Advance Study), Basel, Switzerland Journal of Biological Physics and Chemistry 11 (216-220) At this point the tenor of the presentation changed dramatically from calm, logic science to the harrowing story of one pilot, Len Lawrence.... His story was one of costly legal battles to prove that his brain injury was due to chemical exposure and that he was not mentally unfit. What emerged was a story of incompetence by the medical profession, who lacked knowledge of the symptoms following exposure to neurotoxins and the unfairness of the legal profession in not allowing him to see data concerning his own personal records in their reluctance to tackle those culpable. May Maughan, The Deputy Official Solicitor: “We are not prepared to answer any further queries and your  correspondence in future, whether by e-mail, hard copy letter, or telephone, will not be answered, nor acknowledged. Yours sincerely May Maughan Deputy Official Solicitor Office of the Official Solicitor and Public Trustee  Tel: 020 7911 7121 - may.maughan@offsol.gsi.gov.uk. The Right Honourable Lord Justice Munby President of the Family Division with effect from 11 January 2013 please be advised of the following: Ref: Hearing Royal Courts of Justice 14 January 2013, Leonard Lawrence accused by Alistair Pitbaldo Official Solicitor and May Maughan Deputy Official Solicitor to the Senior Court of an abuse of the legal process following Richard Anelay QC Deputy High Court Judge Family Division establishing in September 2010 that Leonard Lawrence had been a patient subject to the Court of Protection and the Civil Court of Appeal in November 2012 enabling Leonard Lawrence to Appeal to a High Court Family Judge. 1. On the 10 September 2012 Senior District Judge, Principle Registry Family Division directed that “The file, in the first instance, should be sent to the Court of Protection”. The case files were posted to the Court of Protection on 9 October 2012. Following a referral to the Court of Appeal Mr Lawrence is still awaiting a hearing before a High Court Family Judge. On the 13 December 2012 Simpson Millar LLP Solicitors have identified that they failed to make a full disclosure to the Court of Protection. 2. May Maughan Deputy Official Solicitor has advised that she will not make available to the Queens Bench Division, Royal Courts of Justice for the hearing on the 14 January 2013 Leonard Lawrence case files held by the Official Solicitors Office. 3. May Maughan Deputy Official Solicitor also advised that she not make available to the Queens Bench Division, Royal Courts of Justice for the hearing on the 14 January 2013 Court of Protection Medical Certificates CP3′s and other certificates of mental incapacity issued under Part V11 Mental Health Act 1983 that were not disclosed to the courts by Helen Clift a solicitor within the office of the Official Solicitor. 4. May Maughan Deputy Official Solicitor has advised that her office does not hold co pies of the case files of the external legal representatives Ratcliffe Duce & Gammer Solicitors Reading Berks that were appointed by the Official Solicitor. May Maughan personally sent part of Ratcliffe Duce & Gammer Solicitors files to Simpson Millar LLP Bristol on the 20 March 2012 that included the disclosure of a note book from which pages had been cut out. The notes of the conference held at 29 Bedford Row Chambers prior to the Final Hearing that Mr Day of counsel had sought have still not been disclosed by the Official Solicitor to the Senior Court. 5. Whilst May Maughan Deputy Official Official Solicitor finds the assistance afforded to Mr Lawrence by the police amusing, a Chief Constables Office directed the case to a Detective Chief Superintendant this enabled Mr Lawrence to recover May Maughans correspondence to the Law Society and the Law Societies internal files. The Law Societies internal files directs liability at the Official Solicitor for failing to register Mr Lawrence with the Court of Protection. To be blunt the Solicitors Regulatory Authority (SRA) files identifies that SRA case worker Laura Markham and others within the SRA did not believe May Maughan the Deputy Official Solicitor submission neither did the SRA appointed investigating solicitor. 6. Counsel written opinion supports the Law Society internal report and directs liability at the Official Solicitor for failing to register Mr Lawrence with the Court of Protection at the material time. In a video recorded with Barbara Hewson at Hardwicke Chambers, Ms Hewson accused the Official Solicitors office of several human rights violations against Mr Lawrence, this video was made available at the Cranfield Workshop in October 2011. Ms Hewson view was supported by other lawyers and expanded upon in the Journal of Biological Physics and Chemistry ISSN 1512-0856. 7. 20 March 2012 further disclosures by May Maughan Deputy Official Solicitor of Leonard Lawrence case files when Alistair Pitbaldo Of ficial Solicitor and May Maughan Deputy Official Solicitor to the Senior Court was of the belief that Leonard Lawrence was out of time to take legal action against the Official Solicitor. The partial disclosure confirmed that Court of Protection Authority had been required on at least four occasions, identifying that the submission by Alistair Pitbaldo Official Solicitor to the Bar Standard Board could not be supported by the Official Solicitors case file. 8. The former Official Solicitors Laurence Oades counsel Nicholas Allen 29 Bedford Row advised that he cannot support the submissions he made at court. Barrister Mr Allen has disclosed correspondence he sent to his opponent Barrister Dominic Brazil 1 Kings Bench Walk on the 5 August 2005 stating that he simply accepted all that Mr Brazil requested of him not knowing what the consequences were. In September 2010 Dominic Brazil 1 Kings Bench Walk informed Richard Anelay QC Head of Chambers 1 Kings Bench Walk that Mr Lawrence had been a patient subject to the Court of Protection and on the 16 April 2012 Barrister Dominic Brazil informed HHJ Simon Oliver Reading County Court monies should not have been released to Mr Lawrence without Court of Protection approval. 9. A search of the Bar Standards Board (BSB) services providers computer back up system of deleted emails identified that Barrister Caroline Wilbourne 1 Garden Court Chambers has sought advice from the BSB what to do. Barrister Caroline Wilbourne is refusing to make any comment. 10. Whilst searches by HHJ Campbell, HMCTS and others of the court safe’s at Slough and Reading County Court failed to locate missing court hearing tapes thanks to the Detective Chief Superintendant it can be shown that on 18 August 2005 Barrister Simon Calhaem 29 Bedford Row informed His Honour Judge Charles Elly that the former Official Solicitor Laurence Oades had not agreed the sale value of the property 38 Dukes Wood Avenue, Gerrards Cross, Bucks SL9 7JT. HHJ Elly stated that for the Official Solicitor to agree the sale value would in any event undermine many of the points of jurisdiction, HHJ Elly was not happy to leave the matter with barristers. Helen Clift and Miss Wilbourne 1 Garden Court did not return the case to HHJ Elly but were complacent that Dominic Brazil 1 Kings Bench Walk furbished a false statement to District Judge Fortgang alleging that Laurence Oades the Official Solicitor had agreed the sale value of the property 38 Dukes Wood Avenue, Gerrards Cross, Bucks. 11. 16 April 2012 Mr. Day, St Philips Chambers advised HHJ Simon Oliver of the following: FINAL ORDER OF D.J. FORTGANG IS NOT VALID AS IT HAS NOT BEEN SENT TO THE COURT OF PROTECTION. Electronic records identify that Mr Day received what is described by Paul Hicks Simpson Millar LLP Solicitors as an angery phone call from HHJ Simon Oliver the next day. 12. Disclosure by Simpson Millar LLP Solicitors on the 13 December 2012 show that Mrs. Motteram & Mrs. Ballard, Divisional Managers, Official Solicitors Office identified that The Official Solicitor was not authorized to make financial decisions on Mr. Lawrence’s behalf 13. Lord Justice Ward [2009] EWCA Civil 1122 Marco Pierre White –and- Withers LLP 29th October 2009 Comment by Lord Justice Ward 63. The Family Division’s practice to admit all relevant evidence in the search for truth or to impose sanctions where there has been improper conduct. 67. Furthermore, it must always be remembered that solicitors are officers of the court and if they are shown to have done wrong they should face the judgment of the court. It is not conducive to the administration of justice that such claims are simply swept under the carpet. It is in the public interest that the bounds of proper conduct be clarified. Leonard Lawrence Cc The Right Honourable Lord Justice Munby as President of the Family Division with effect from 11 January 2013.